Talk:Rugby Football Union

Rugby union High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV

The controvery section probably needs a re-write. It's too POV near the end of the paragraph. - Shudda ^talk 03:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought about trying to re-write it as NPOV but there was literally nothing that could be saved. Would an understrength All Blacks necessarily thrash England? They might but it is hardly a certainty. Is it so hard to understand the clubs' attitude? Not really. In the end I just deleted it.GordyB 20:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:RFU.svg

The image File:RFU.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:49, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rugby clubs withdraw from the Football Association

There should be some mention of the original FA meetings which lead to the diversion between rugby football and the FA's form of football. 174.29.180.83 (talk) 00:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is crucial in the history. Before formalisation of the rules which formed into two camps, Association and Rugby, there were many rules. Many clubs had their own rules with visiting teams having to play to their rules. Association rules were laid down in 1863. The rules of the Rugby Football Union were laid down in 1871. Liverpool Football Club, from 1857, not Liverpool Athletic Football Club in the Association Football Premier League, is a rugby club, never having played Association rules - but named a football club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wisdom-inc (talk • contribs) 11:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rugby Football Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080105151755/http://www.fira-aer-rugby.com:80/article_detail.php?article=80&modeAf=tableauFormulaire to http://www.fira-aer-rugby.com/article_detail.php?article=80&modeAf=tableauFormulaire

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rugby Football Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]